Rotation Madness and estimation screw-ups

What is it with rotation conventions and mining software providers? Every company seems to want to use a unique, individual method of defining the rotation and then provide a set of instructions guaranteed to confuse anyone who attempts to read them. I might not be the sharpest tool in the shed and I like to think I am not stupid but working out what rotation has been used to estimate a resource sometimes does my head in. If you use Surpac, and if someone gives you a model estimated using Vulcan the rotations discussed in the paperwork (assuming the author got it correct in the first place) are different. But it is different again in Datamine where it seems you simply make it up as you go along! I reviewed a model done using Datamine where every domain used a different rotation convention (Dom1 = 3:2:1, Dom 2 = 3:1:3, Dom 3 = 3:1:2). And when I tried to create a search ellipse to match these rotations I simply could not get one to match the smoothing trend I could see i...